Criminal law. Special Part II. Thematic course. Edition 6
In February 2022, the 6th edition of "Criminal Law. Special Part II. Thematic course" appeared at C.H. Beck publishing house, written by Prof. Cristina Rotaru, PhD, Prof. Valerian Cioclei, PhD and Associate Professor Andra-Roxana Trandafir, PhD. The work, as the title indicates, aims at a thematic approach, being analyzed only those offenses from the Criminal Code that are part of the topic provided for the criminal law matter. The special part of the second semester, according to the discipline sheet from the Faculty of Law of the University of Bucharest. Thus, the work is intended, first of all, for students, in order to prepare the semester exam. At the same time, the graduates can use this work for the preparation of the bachelor's examination and the entrance exams in the profession (law, magistracy) for the appropriate part of the topic. Finally, the work can also be useful to practitioners, because in a criminal justice full of uncertainties, of "preliminary questions", any enlightening opinion on a question of law can
Participation in the conference "Cybercrime and virtual currencies. Special methods of surveillance or research'
On February 24, 2022, Mrs. Andra-Roxana Trandafir, lawyer, was part of the scientific committee of the conference "Cybercrime and virtual currencies. Special methods of surveillance or research", organized by the Society of Legal Sciences. The lawyer moderated the first panel, entitled "Traditional cybercrime and virtual currencies" and gave a presentation at the third panel. The presentation concerned obtaining data on the financial situation or financial transactions of a person. The situation of virtual currencies and is part of a broader research on precautionary measures on virtual currencies, which will be materialized in an article published in co-authorship with the lawyer George Zlati.
High Court of Cassation and Justice. Appeal upheld. Referral to the Constitutional Court. The notion of "military". Code of Criminal Procedure versus Special Legislation. Predictability
By judgment no. 47/01.02.2022, the Supreme Court admitted the appeal filed by Daniel NIȚU - Law Office against the interim conclusion of 17.01.2022 of the Cluj Court of Appeal. The representation of the clients' interests before the High Court of Cassation and Justice was ensured by Mrs. Lawyer, assoc. prof. dr. Andra-Roxana TRANDAFIR, representing one of the collaborations between the two law offices. By the recalled conclusion, the Court of Cluj-Napoca had rejected the request to notify the Constitutional Court with an exception regarding the significance of the notion of "military" found in the Code of Criminal Procedure in the matter of the personal competence of the military prosecutor's offices. In essence, the admissibility issues concerned by the appeal concerned the interpretative decisions and the recently established manipulative decisions of the constitutional court; on the merits, the provisions of art. 37 and 56 of the Criminal Procedure Code were analyzed compared to those in art. 1 and art. 4 of Law nr. 80/1995 on the status of military personnel, to emphasize the violation of constitutional and conventional standards